also sprach Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> [2009.08.03.1047 +0200]:
> > In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this
> > point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state
> > the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide
> > security upgrades for squeeze).
>
> Oh, did they?
That was just one possible outcome/example.
> > Hope this helps,
>
> I dont think so. You made it sound as if Debian would follow
> Ubuntu or Marks wishes, and that Ubuntu/Canonical has committed to
> support Debian. AFAIK, we dont and they dont.
I phrased it badly then. It's exactly points like this which need to
be addressed explicitly: why are we doing this? And iff
Canonical/Ubuntu is part of the reason, then state exactly where the
benefits for Debian are, and ideally how this decision was reached
in the first place.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"a fundamentalist is someone who hates sin more than he loves virtue."
-- john h. schaar
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)