Re: binNMUs for the GNOME transitions
+ Josselin Mouette (Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:34:34 +0200):
> Hi,
Hello!
> totem-pl-parser transition:
> - brasero_0.8.0-3
Done.
> gnome-desktop transition:
> - avant-window-navigator_0.3.2-1
> - awn-extras-applets_0.3.2.1-1
> - compiz_0.8.2-1 (probably only on amd64)
> - deskbar-applet_2.24.3-1
> - desktop-data-model_1.2.5-1
> - eog_2.24.3.1-1
> - galeon_2.0.6-2.1
> - gnome-launch-box_0.2-1.1
> - gnome-mag_1:0.15.4-1
> - gnome-utils_2.24.1-2
> - icewm_1.2.37-1
> - quick-lounge-applet_2.12.5-5
Done, except:
> - beagle_0.3.9-2
since AFAIK it FTBFSes due to Build-Depending on libgnome2.0-cil (which
has been dropped in favour of libgnome2.24-cil).
> both of them:
> - gnome-python-desktop_2.24.1-1
Done.
> - tracker_0.6.92-1
This one got a sourceful upload that seems that managed to arrive in
time, though I’m unsure if the dep-waits are correct:
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=tracker
> nautilus extension path change:
> - diff-ext_0.2.3-3
> - eiciel_0.9.6.1-2
> - evince_2.24.2-2
> - gksu_2.0.2-2
> - nautilus-actions_1.4.1-1
> - nautilus-share_0.7.2-4
> - seahorse-plugins_2.24.1-3
All scheduled, except eiciel, which had a version mismatch (0.9.6.1-3 uploaded
a couple days ago). It had bumped build-dep on libnautilus-extension-dev, so
it should be fine.
> No need to schedule the rest of them, they need sourceful uploads, many
> of which have already occurred.
Okay, great.
Cheers,
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
Reply to: