Re: libgpod transition
* Frank Lichtenheld [Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:32:40 +0100]:
> As gtkpod is now out of NEW, I'm myself prepared for a libgpod
> transition in unstable. The rdepends are:
Okay. amarok and rhythmbox are part of the libmtp transition, but the
rest is free from other ties. I think it is reasonable to go ahead with
this transition at the same time as libmtp, with the remarks indicated
> So far gtkpod and amarok in experimental already build against the
> new libgpod, and kipi-plugins in experimental seems to have dropped
> the dependency,
I guess you'll be uploading gtkpod to unstable yourselves soon.
Regarding amarok and kipi-plugins, the versions of experimental are
intended to work with KDE4, which is not unstable material yet.
> I haven't gotten around to test the other rdepends yet.
> If the maintainers have any more information about the status, that
> would be welcome.
Since it's a very small set of reverse dependencies, I'd really
appreciate if you could rebuild the versions in unstable against the new
libgpod, and report if they all build successfully (but note #516564 for
rhythmbox). Additionally, you need not worry about tripod, since it's
not in testing.
> Also welcome would be some input from the release team how this
> transitions is going to be scheduled.
If you can report that the packages can be rebuilt without problems, we
can go forward with this transition immediately.
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
The first step on the road to wisdom is the admission of ignorance. The
second step is realizing that you don't have to blab it to the world.