Re: Bug#514818: lenny-backports not a recognised distribution
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> [2009.02.11.0800 +0100]:
> > > If this also applies to the lenny version, this bug should be
> > > made RC!
> >
> > It does (I'm assuming there'll also be a lenny-volatile in the not
> > too distant future).
> >
> > If the release team would be happy to accept a tpu update for this
> > at this late stage then I should be able to arrange one this
> > evening.
>
> Please do. Having a devscripts in lenny whose dch is not aware of
> lenny-* (of which lenny-volatile is official and lenny-backports
> almost so) is IMHO unacceptable.
Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds
those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still
create an etch-backports upload, but I haven't changed that in order to
keep the diff minimal and because --bpo is a convenience method).
Adam
diff -Nru devscripts-2.10.35lenny2/debian/changelog devscripts-2.10.35lenny3/debian/changelog
--- devscripts-2.10.35lenny2/debian/changelog 2009-01-10 18:08:11.000000000 +0000
+++ devscripts-2.10.35lenny3/debian/changelog 2009-02-11 07:52:05.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+devscripts (2.10.35lenny3) testing; urgency=low
+
+ * debchange: Recognise lenny-backports and lenny-volatile as valid Debian
+ distributions. (Closes: #514818)
+
+ -- Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:48:29 +0000
+
devscripts (2.10.35lenny2) testing; urgency=low
* debsign: Use mktemp rather than a directory based on the process ID.
diff -Nru devscripts-2.10.35lenny2/scripts/debchange.pl devscripts-2.10.35lenny3/scripts/debchange.pl
--- devscripts-2.10.35lenny2/scripts/debchange.pl 2008-07-03 19:51:04.000000000 +0100
+++ devscripts-2.10.35lenny3/scripts/debchange.pl 2009-02-11 07:48:12.000000000 +0000
@@ -383,8 +383,8 @@
$distributor ||= 'Debian';
if ($distributor eq 'Debian') {
- unless ($opt_D =~ /^(unstable|((old)?stable|testing)(-security)?|experimental|UNRELEASED|(sarge|etch)(-volatile|-backports)?|((oldstable|testing)-)?proposed-updates)$/) {
- warn "$progname warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, stable,\noldstable, experimental, UNRELEASED, {sarge,etch}-{volatile,backports},\n{oldstable-,testing-,}proposed-updates and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security.\nUsing your request anyway.\n";
+ unless ($opt_D =~ /^(unstable|((old)?stable|testing)(-security)?|experimental|UNRELEASED|(sarge|etch|lenny)(-volatile|-backports)?|((oldstable|testing)-)?proposed-updates)$/) {
+ warn "$progname warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, stable,\noldstable, experimental, UNRELEASED, {sarge,etch,lenny}-{volatile,backports},\n{oldstable-,testing-,}proposed-updates and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security.\nUsing your request anyway.\n";
$warnings++ if not $opt_force_dist;
}
} elsif ($distributor eq 'Ubuntu') {
Reply to: