Re: Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-6 (was: 0.9~r1696.dfsg-5)

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-6 (was: 0.9~r1696.dfsg-5)
From: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:03:47 +0100
Message-id: <871vu61858.fsf_-_@sonic.technologeek.org>
In-reply-to: <87r62arv84.fsf@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> (Marc Brockschmidt's message of "Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:51:39 +0100")
References: <8763jng1rf.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org> <87r62arv84.fsf@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de>

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> wrote:

Hi,

>> mt-daapd (0.9~r1696.dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=low

> Unblocked.

And you can update that for 0.9~r1696.dfsg-6, due to yet another
issue, namely ...

mt-daapd (0.9~r1696.dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=medium

  * debian/mt-daapd.init:
    + Add --oknodo to ssd invocation in startd() (closes: #514760).

 -- Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>  Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:58:38 +0100

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org> 
 
 Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-6
  - From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>

References:
- Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-5 / candidate for Lenny r1
  - From: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
- Re: Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-5 / candidate for Lenny r1
  - From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>

Prev by Date: Re: geda-gnetlist, geda-gsymcheck not uploaded
Next by Date: Re: Proposed xine-lib updates for lenny (security & regressions)
Previous by thread: Re: Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-5 / candidate for Lenny r1
Next by thread: Re: Possible unblock for mt-daapd 0.9~r1696.dfsg-6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread