This one time, at band camp, Philipp Kern said: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 05:50:19PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I maintain klamav. As I understand it, DM's don't have upload rights to > > volatile. I don't really have time to deal with sponsorship hassles > > currently, so I'd probably orphan the package. > > So clamav is not sufficently modular to separate the library and the scan > engines? Ho hum. No, or at least not yet. There are two basic issues that can't be addressed with signature updates: support for new unpackers, and support for new signature types. I'm hoping once upstream gets support for all of the more common unpackers, things will settle down a bit, since the need to update signature types is less common. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature