[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: HPPA and lenny



On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Jürgen Leibner wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 00:07 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while discussing the state of our infrastructure among some members
> > of DSA and the security team we once more realized how badly hppa was
> > doing.  First concerns about this architecture were raised at least
> > half a year ago, and it doesn't appear as if we are any closer to
> > resolving them.  It doesn't look good at all.
> >
> > We do have two autobuilders, but one of them is currently down for
> > whatever
> >
> > reason (and the rsys excuse for remote management is a joke):
> > | [17208343.620000] awk (pid 1061): Protection id trap (code 27) at
> > | 00000000400b4763 [17208343.712000] Backtrace:
> > | [17208343.740000]
> >
> > (that's the complete output.)
> >
> > This may or may not be related to the issue where everytime something
> > even remotely related to ruby gets close to the system they lock up.
> >
> > At least the (random) crashing issue has to be fixed if hppa wants
> > to release with lenny.
> >
> > We already had this discussion in June and again in October but I
> > don't think anything came from it.
> >
> > Having little to no buildd redundancy is currently hurting us even
> > for etch as security updates are missing for at least perl.
> >
> > (Also, the porter machine is currently down.  We cannot reach it over
> > the network and the serial console is just dead.)
> >
> > With my DSA hat on I can say that we will not be able to provide
> > porter machines and buildd systems if they are not capable of running
> > reliably.
> >
> > Again, if you want to release with lenny *you* will have to fix that.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > weasel
> > --
> >
> >                            |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
> >
> >       Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
> >  http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
> >
> >                            |   `-    http://www.debian.org/
> 
> Hi @all,
> 
> I have here an old and also slow HP D360/2 running an up to date Debian 
> 5.0 (unstable/testing) with running the debian kernel 
> linux-image-2.6.26-1-parisc-smp. 

Two HP machines here too - old and slow, but probably usable.
> 

Andy



Reply to: