Re: Please allow base-files 5 in lenny
Hi,
Santiago Vila wrote:
> BTW: Should I worry about Bug#508772? This is the very first time in
> 10 years that someone seems unconvenienced by seeing a version number
> like 5.0 in unstable for a few weeks. Are there really packages which
> break because of this? If not, I feel that the BTS is being abused.
If it wouldn't break stuff I wouldn't have filed this as a "important" bug
(but as minor)
openoffice.org 3.x is already prepared for lenny backports and does that
based on checking lsb_releases output. Without hacking it to use =sid
for the variable (which is bogus, and breaks the distribution which should
not be named, too) I loose the changes for the mono 2.0 transition and
the dependency on the "normal" liblucene2-java (it would use the internal
copy instead) when uploading this without change built on a sid/building on
a buildd which for some reason has base-files 5.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Reply to: