Re: Opinion of the Release Team on the ImageMagick transition
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>> http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/507269/diff-control.txt
>
> Hmm why didn't you add the Provides to libmagickwand-dev (which depends
> on libmagickcore-dev and so pulls everything which used to be there)?
>
>> xine-lib - FTBFS (I think that it's not related with imagemagick)
>
> The symptom for broken imagemagick (well Wand) handling in this case is
> that the build seems to go to the end, but it fails with some missing
> plugin during dh_install or something similar. Looking at the build
> log you provided, it's exactly the output I've hit with the new
> imagemagick in Ubuntu (which I fixed by changing xine-lib's build-deps
> in Ubuntu).
>
>> librmagick-ruby - versioned depends on libmagick9-dev
>> human-icon-theme - versioned depends on libmagick9-dev
>> tangerine-icon-theme - versioned depends on libmagick9-dev
>
> I've pushed tangerine-icon-theme/0.26.debian-3 with a "libmagickcore-dev
> | libmagick9-dev" (unversionned) build-dep; it relies on
> ImageMagick.pc and the "convert" program. In fact it doesn't really
> the ImageMagick libs, it just needs the .pc file to check the version
> of IM.
>
> I've also pushed human-icon-theme/0.28.debian-3 with the exact same
> changes for the same reasons.
>
> Release team: could you please unblock these two? Not critical for
> lenny, but gets things in shape.
both unblocked
cheers
Luk
Reply to: