[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: freeze exception for libnagios-object-perl



* Ryan Niebur [Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:12:40 -0700]:

> I would like you guys to consider a freeze exception for an RC bug fix
> in libnagios-object-perl. The patch adds support for Nagios 3, the
> version in Lenny. I'd also like to include a few documentation/minor
> changes with it.

> My sponser told me to ask before he uploaded it, so I have attached an
> interdiff with the patches taken out, and attached them separately
> (for readability).

> Here's the changelog:
>  libnagios-object-perl (0.14-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
>  .
>    [ Ryan Niebur ]
>    * New maintainer (Closes: #501941)
>    * bump standards version to 3.8.0
>      - added a README.source
>      - use the Homepage field
>    * nothing is compiled. no need for CFLAGS.
>    * Build distclean
>      - no need to run make clean, there is no makefile.
>    * use quilt
>    * don't install the scripts and their documentation. It seems that
>      the old package didn't have the scripts even though if I build it
>      from source it does. so, for now, just don't include it.
>    * Work with Nagios 3, the version in Debian Lenny. Patch from
>      http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=33125, thanks
>      TOMDAAE. (Closes: #503900)
>    * Added patch to use correct path to status.dat in man pages
>    * fix short description
>    * add whatis descriptions to man pages
>    * add Vcs-{Browser,Svn} fields
>    * Removed accidental inclusion of work in progress code in the man
>      page
>  .
>    [ Damyan Ivanov ]
>    * debian/watch: use dist-based URL.
>    * debian/control: use dist-based Homepage

Ok; only the fix itself would have been better, but I didn't mind to
review it. Please upload.

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
     Listening to: Bebo Valdés & Diego El Cigala - Nieblas del riachuelo


Reply to: