Re: Consider tagging #502858 lenny-ignore (was: Re: aptitude: changelog entry malformed)
On Tue, October 21, 2008 14:48, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
>
>> On 08/10/20 22:04 +1100, Ben Finney said ...
>>
>>> Package: aptitude
>>> Version: 0.4.11.9-1lenny1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justification: violates Policy §4.4
>>>
>>
>> This part of the policy is a "should" and not a "must". I'll leave it
>> to the package maintainer, but I suppose this bug is not "serious". It
>> would be made "must" (post #489460 which is not yet released).
>
> I disagree that the severity should be lowered, because according to
> the documentation on bugs.d.o this severity is perfectly fine for such
> kind of issues. However I agree that this issue shouldn't hinder us from
> releasing (if it would be the only rc bug ;), so in my pov the
> release-team should tag this a lenny-ignore issue.
>
> What does release team say about this?
How about just fixing that changelog entry instead of having this
discussion? Or am I missing something here that makes the fix not an
extremely trivial one?
Thijs
Reply to: