Re: Upload of dpkg 1.14.21 to unstable
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Guillem Jover wrote:
>>> Thanks, uploaded now, and built everywhere. I forgot to mention in my
>>> initial mail, that in addition to the normal testing, I did an upgrade
>>> from etch to lenny, with out of disk conditions, and everything seemed
>>> fine (except for apt-get or aptitude issues while trying to get an
>>> upgrade solution). But still, I guess it would be no harm to set a
>>> longer age, say 15 or a bit more?
>> unblocked, set age-days to 15
>
> Thanks, unfortunately we had to upload 1.14.22 due to a small regression.
> This version contains only 3 code changes:
> - an important bugfix on dpkg-gensymbols:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=c1947e80027fece5e67b7b1fea95ea113f5b307e
> - 2 bugfixes concerning the new source format, the second link is the
> regression that we wanted to fix
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=246986993791123226c4a7fd5ad56591a9ee9c4d
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=787f5f4c034ee5570ba540d0db838f546f0c158c
>
> Please update your unblock hint and maybe reduce the aging to 5 days
> because we really want the (trigger-related) fixes from 1.14.21 in lenny
> before many more people start testing etch-lenny upgrades.
unblocked, set age-days to 6.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: