Re: on removing roxen4

[Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>]

Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other
> not built from source).
> Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4
> would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils)
> have been in the last stable release or are terribly popular (roxen4
> popcon is 15 installs), I wonder whether the default option should be
> removal from testing if this isn't fixed in a timely manner.

removal hint added

Cheers

Luk