On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 01:42:57PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2008 13:15, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> wrote:
> > Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Please include the latest checkpolicy in Lenny. It is needed to build
> > > the recent versions of the policy (such as the one that is already in
> > > Lenny).
> > The package failed to build on some architectures as apparantly libsepol
> > was not recent enough at the time (which btw is not obvious from the
> > buildlog):
> > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=checkpolicy
> > I guess you should know about it as you uploaded the 'fixed' libsepol.
> > Anyway, I'll give-back the package on the architectures it failed before.
> None of the SE Linux packages are usable on Hurd. Is it worth uploading
> versions of them specifying that they should not be compiled on Hurd?
Please reread the information given by Luk. The link says that he gave
it back on i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, arm, armel and s390 due to
libsepol messing with builds:
libsepol (2.0.30-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added exec_prefix to libselinux.pc.
Closes: #489724
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature