Hello together, Am Freitag, den 05.12.2008, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Now the problem is that data exchange from 3.0 to 2.x results in documents > > > with blanked text so the user will not see the data of the text. > > But only when the text was formatted as hidden if I read the issue right? No. OOo 3 writes the attribute display:text='true' (so the text is visible) in the document. This is correct ODF standard. OOo 2 has the problem that it uses this option the oposite way. Files with the ODF standard correct display:text='true' will be hidden text. The result is: If you save a visible text in OOo 3 then this will be hidden in OOo 2 and if you save a hidden text in OOo 3 then this will be visible in OOo 2. OOo 3 fix this then opening OOo 2 files so the problem with reverted option display:text is not visible there. > > > The solutions afaik: > > > > > > 1. release OOo 3.0 in lenny :) > > > > I doubt -release will accept that, they didn't even accept 2.4.2 (which I > > do understand) > > > > And I'd not put 3.0 into lenny, we would have to wait for 3.0.1. > > > > > 2. OOo 2.x needs a patch which fixes the import of OOo > 3.0 files with the correct > > > interpretation of display:text=. Sadly upsteam/a upstream developer wrote in > > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878 that they will not fix it > > > (or tend to this).:( > > > > I wouldn't have expected anything else. > > And I definitely won't be able to fix it. IMHO this is a very big problem. Giving our users OpenOffice.org in version 2.x which cannot read OOo 3 files correctly for the next 2 year where the rest of the world will use OOo 3 files our users might tend to dislike this.:( I prefer to put OOo 3.x into lenny because this is IMHO the major desktop application for alot of users. -- Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil