Hi, sugar-calculate-activity sugar-chat-activity sugar-memorize-activity sugar-pippy-activity sugar-web-activity sugar-sharingtest-activity are all effected by serious bugs which can either be fixed via t-p-u or with new upstream versions via unstable. (Or via removals of the affected packages.) Personally I think 0.81 (=what's in lenny currently) is not worth releasing with, as every sugar deployment in the world (mostly ~1mio XO laptops, but there are other deployments on other hardware coming) now has switched to 0.82 and 0.81 is also not supported upstream anymore. OTOH, sugar has no reverse depends (well, except education-desktop-sugar from Debian Edu, we/I will handle that, whatever the outcome will be), is optional and is also pretty new and pretty outstanding in its field of use, so I would really appreciate if you could make a huge exception and let sugar 0.82 in. But the point is, broken sugar packages cannot effect anything else than sugar. So, I kindly ask you to not call me crazy (you'll probably do so anyway) and unblock those packages. I'd understand if you'd say "no" for consistency reasons (there are lots of packages which cannot effect others...) but for the sake of the children of the world I'm asking. Sugar is truely something new and exciting and it would be great, if Debian lenny would be a first class basis for it. regards, Holger sugar-presence-service sugar-artwork sugar-toolkit sugar-datastore dont have RC bugs but are in the same boat.
Description: PGP signature