Hi,
* Nico Golde <debian-release+ml@ngolde.de> [2008-10-07 14:50]:
> Hi Manoj,
> * Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@ieee.org> [2008-10-07 13:07]:
> > On Sat, Oct 04 2008, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > * Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> [2008-10-04 16:39]:
> > >> On the other hand, back-porting the fix will probably be pretty
> > >> easy, though still a chore. Since this is an automatically generated
> > >> request, I'd like the input of a human before I undertake the task --
> > >> is this report, which was not deemed important enough to be called a
> > >> security risk, Worth the effort? Will we release Lenny before the next
> > >> point release?
> > >
> > > In my opinion yes. It's not that this is no security risk at
> > > all, of course it is a security risk, it is tracked as low
> > > in our security tracker. But the security team would be just
> > > overloaded if we would release a DSA for every single tmp
> > > race issue that was reported recently. I think back-porting
> > > the fix is not that much work and the users of dist will be
> > > thankful for that (even if there are only ~100).
> >
> > Well, uploaded a package for stable. I must say it was hard to
> > resist adding the bug fixes that have happened since. I also no longer
> > use arch, so the new source is missing masses of .arch-ids directories
> > and, of course, {arch}.
>
> Thanks a lot for your work! Release team, can you approve
> the package?
Does anyone know what happened to the package?
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Attachment:
pgpOpNKnyTs8u.pgp
Description: PGP signature