Patrick Winnertz wrote on Thursday 09 October 2008 at 14:58:28: > Hello Release Team! > > Would it be possible to let a newer lustre version into lenny (1.6.5.1-3 vs > 1.6.5.1-2 ) > -3 will fix one huge error concerning usabillity for lustre servers. The > patch which was allowed to migrate last time was not completly correct: > Under some circumstances this patch leads to an unknown symbol in module > error. This makes then the complete server part of lustre useless. The fix > is a very small one.. only two small typos. > > Furthermore this patch adds three more lines of codes concerning inode > locking. > As iget() on some point in the kernel we have to use there iget_locked > together with a small if condition. [1]. As someone told me that the patch is quite confusing with the many lines of change because of timestamps I shortened the patch to the relevant part (mainly by deleting the unimportant hunks). This patch is available here: http://people.debian.org/~winnie/lustre-diff.patch Hope this helps Greetings Winnie -- . '' ` . Patrick Winnertz <winnie@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~winnie - http://www.der-winnie.de `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.