Hey, sorry for the delay, > AFAICS the relevant line is not this one: > > - IPADDRESSES=`(echo $( /bin/hostname -i ) ; > + IPADDRESSES=`(echo $( /bin/hostname -i ) ; > > but this one: > > - ) 2>&1 | /usr/bin/mailx -a "Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" -s "$DISTRIB_ID package updates on `/bin/hostname`" $EMAIL > + ) 2>&1 | /usr/bin/mailx -a "Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" -s "$DISTRIB_ID package updates on $SYSTEM" $EMAIL > > and the script sets SYSTEM to: > > # Set the SYSTEM > SYSTEM=`/bin/hostname -f` That's it. > > Why did you make the ucf calls unconditional in the postrm? > > This question still holds. Tiago? Due to the "command-with-path-in-maintainer-script postrm:5 /usr/bin/ucf" lintian warning I considered useless testing if ucf is there. I mean, if I can't call ucf by using its default system path, why do I have to check it? (it is a real question actually - not sure about my decision here) btw, if you didn't unblock it, please wait for the 1.1.25 which has a one-line fix pending :\ -- Tiago Bortoletto Vaz http://tiagovaz.org 0xA504FECA - http://pgp.mit.edu GNU/Linux user #188687
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature