On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:29:10AM -0300, Filipe Lautert wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Michael Schutte wrote: >> The revision of libxml-ruby currently in unstable fixes an important >> bug. The boring changelog: >> >> | libxml-ruby (0.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=low >> | >> | * New upstream version (closes: #485738). >> >> The changes are big, but this version has been in the archive for a >> month and now new bugs have been filed since then. > > You mean *NO* new bugs have been filed, right? Cause the package is clean > for a month now :) D’oh… Of course that’s what I meant. >> Still, because I assume that you do not want to let new upstream >> releases in at this point, I attach the debdiff for a possible t-p-u >> upload backporting the required fix. > > Well, it has been a month, and I'd not like to starting patching old > releases of libxml before a release. As it has been in sid for a month now > and there are no new bugs in it, maybe release team could allow this > package to go to testing. Seconded. > I was going to ask this next week together with other packages, but now > that you raised the question... > > ***release team***, please unblock package libxml-ruby version 0.8.3-1 . > > Please mates, don't make me start to have lots of diff in my package for > the whole lenny cicle, ok? :) My apologies, I didn’t mean to stab you in the back. -- Michael Schutte <michi@uiae.at>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature