Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 03:52:00AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Well, so the current solution breaks all of file-rc, sysv-rc, and insserv; > is unnecessary for insserv (because the sequence numbers don't need to be > reset for a dependency-based init system); and there's another way to handle > sysv-rc. This statement is incorrect. The current solution does update the priorities for all three implementations [*], it doesn't preserve local modifications though. That's the pain of trying to support multiple implementations half-assed instead of one fully. Michael [*] Although insserv determines the start priorities dynamically, it can be necessary to use the remove + add approach, i.e. if you change what runlevels a service is started or stopped. See also the discussion about not stopping services in 0/6. If you remove those runlevels from Default-Stop:, insserv will not automatically remove the symlinks from those runlevels. I fwiw consider this a but in insserv, see #477415 -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature