[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: owl-dms removal from lenny

Steffen Joeris <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de> writes:
> owl-dms has only a few users according to popcon[0] and is vulnerable to a few 
> security issues[1]. The question is whether it would be better to remove it 
> from lenny and maybe give it one more release cycle to improve and age
> a bit. It would also shift some workload away from the security team :)
> What does the release team and the maintainer think about a removal?

It looks like a removal might be reasonable right now, but I really
would love to hear a word from the maintainer about this.

BOFH #103:
operators on strike due to broken coffee machine

Attachment: pgpv05cvDzeBC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: