On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:27:22AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > I see that they are now all finished and installed. Yet the PTS for > > gxmlcpp doesn't show the +b1 packages in unstable. And the haxx.se > > excuses for cppunit still read as above; i.e. no mention of the +b1 > > version, and still the claim that they have the same version in > > unstable and testing. > > > > What's up with that? > > The PTS shows source packages, you have to look at packages.debian.org > to see the binary packages. > > cppunit and the binNMUs of sp-gxmlcpp have to transition to testing > together otherwise cppunit would still make the non binNMUed sp-gxmlcpp > binary packages uninstallable => I have added a hint. Ah. OK, this makes sense. Thanks for the explanation and for the hint! -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature