Unidentified subject!

>From thijs@debian.org  Sat May 10 14:21:39 2008
Return-Path: <thijs@debian.org>
X-Original-To: white@ned.snow-crash.org
Delivered-To: white@ned.snow-crash.org
X-No-Auth: unauthenticated sender
Received: from mail.gnu-tec.de (gnu.lugrav.de [82.165.39.119])
	by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EFF3489A
	for <white@ned.snow-crash.org>; Sat, 10 May 2008 14:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.gnu-tec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6286CEBABA
	for <white@ned.snow-crash.org>; Sat, 10 May 2008 14:20:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.gnu-tec.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (gnu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
	id 09572-04-11 for <white@ned.snow-crash.org>;
	Sat, 10 May 2008 14:20:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl (aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl [82.94.246.244])
	by mail.gnu-tec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E68EB98C
	for <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>; Sat, 10 May 2008 14:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD262175D29;
	Sat, 10 May 2008 14:19:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Received: from aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Lx8jzKM3c2Bu; Sat, 10 May 2008 14:19:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wm.kinkhorst.nl (aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C05175D27;
	Sat, 10 May 2008 14:19:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 131.211.39.72
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user tklists)
        by wm.kinkhorst.nl with HTTP;
        Sat, 10 May 2008 14:19:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <6af21a55a24c37341b0756ff52257f2a.squirrel@wm.kinkhorst.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200805102152.54436.steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>
References: <[🔎] 200805102124.06232.steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>
    <[🔎] 20080510114807.GE20421@ngolde.de>
    <200805102152.54436.steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 14:19:53 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [Secure-testing-team] bump for phpgedview
From: "Thijs Kinkhorst" <thijs@debian.org>
To: "Steffen Joeris" <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de>
Cc: secure-testing-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at skolelinux.de
X-ned.snow-crash.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ned.snow-crash.org-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam,
	SpamAssassin (Wertung=-2.44, benoetigt 4.5, autolearn=not spam,
	AWL 0.02, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14)
X-MailScanner-From: thijs@debian.org
X-UID: 242
X-Length: 3443

On Sat, May 10, 2008 13:52, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:48:07 pm Nico Golde wrote:
>
>> Hi Steffen,
>>
>>
>> * Steffen Joeris <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de> [2008-05-10 13:45]:
>>
>>> Could I please get a bump for the phpgedview package so that it
>>> reaches testing sooner? It fixes this CVE(0) and is already 6 days old.
>>>
>>
>> No need imho, referring to Thijs this is more like a
>> non-issue.
> So can we mark it as unimportant?

I've contacted upstream in the meantime and there are issues not made
explicit in the changelog. I'm not completely clear on their exact impact
but bumping can't hurt here.


Thijs