On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a > kernel bug? > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If anything, more breakages gives us a better chance to debug it. I'd just need gcc-4.2 to stick around for a while for the kernel. regards, Kyle