Re: binNMUs due to lam
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:17:24PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:08:29PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > clustalw-mpi - 0.13-3
> > gromacs - 3.3.2-3
> > python-scientific - 2.4.11-1
> > alps-light1 - 1.2.2-2.1
> > xmpi - 2.2.3b8-10
> > netpipe - 3.6.2-2
> > tessa - 0.3.1-4
> > tree-puzzle - 5.2-2
> > These should be OK to the best of my knowledge. If there are any
> > mistakes, please do let me know.
> Reformatted:
> [package]_[source-version], [reason], [binNMU number], [list of archs]
> clustalw-mpi_0.13-3, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 1, all
> gromacs_3.3.2-3, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 1, all
> python-scientific_2.4.11-1, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 1, all
> alps-light1_1.2.2-2.1, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 2, all
> xmpi_2.2.3b8-10, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 1, all
> netpipe_3.6.2-2, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 2, all
> tessa_0.3.1-4, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 1, all
> tree-puzzle_5.2-2, lam4c2 changed to liblam4 in lam, 1, all
Scheduled (minus gromacs, as mentioned in your follow-up).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Reply to: