Re: binNMU enough to fix #462556 ?

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org, 462556-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: binNMU enough to fix #462556 ?
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:19:04 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080127191904.GK32227@dario.dodds.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-release@lists.debian.org, 462556-done@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200801271421.09428.holger@layer-acht.org>
References: <[🔎] 200801271421.09428.holger@layer-acht.org>

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> is a binNMU sufficient to fix #462556 ?

Should be; binNMUs scheduled.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- binNMU enough to fix #462556 ?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Should tasksel be installable on all archs?
Next by Date: Re: Should tasksel be installable on all archs?
Previous by thread: Re: binNMU enough to fix #462556 ?
Next by thread: 'rott' package still not in testing (not-for-us on s390)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread