[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should tasksel be installable on all archs?



Hi,

On Sunday 27 January 2008 02:02, Joey Hess wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 January 2008 00:15, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > laptop-detect should be built on all arches. I don't know why none of
> > > the recent versions (for nearly a year) have been tried on s390.
> > AIUI because the s390 maintainer set "Not-for-Us" on 2007 May 27 , see
> > http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=laptop-detect
> Well I don't know why the s390 arch maintainers want to make things more
> complicated for the rest of us. (It's not as if s390 is the only
> architecture to not have any laptops.)

Waldi (bcc: in case he isn't subscribed) told me he did this, because it's 
priority "important" and thus changes the default install. I don't quite get 
this, as it should be a no-op (on s390) and (if this is true) since this also 
changes the default install on other archs...

And as tasksel depends on laptop-detect, this makes tasksel uninstallable on 
s390 and prevents laptop-detect from migrating to testing - the version in 
testing in almost a year old. 

How is this supposed to be resolved? 


regards,
	Holger

p.s.: resent as debconf-release doesnt exist :-) dropped debian-edu and 
laptop-detect maintainers from to: headers for the resent.

Attachment: pgpxahi0Bnn9e.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: