[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Please remove libgssapi from testing (was: conflicting gssapi libraries)



On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:03:47PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2007-September/006695.html
>
>The following message belongs to the thread listed above.
>
>>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:57:24 -0400
>>From: Kevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu>
>>To: heimdal-discuss@sics.se, Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
>>Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
>>Subject: Re: conflict between heimdal and umich gssapi library and their consequences
>>
>>On 9/1/07, Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>I'm fairly sure that for right now Debian is just living with the problem
>>>and conflicting the libraries.  That makes Heimdal almost unusable in
>>>Debian since the UMich GSS-API indirection layer gets pulled in by the
>>>NFSv4 support, which is part of standard.
>>>
>>>I'm still of the opinion that UMich was at fault here and they need to 
>>>rename their GSS-API library to something else.  Heimdal was using that
>>>library name first, and regardless of how much more "generic" they think
>>>their indirection layer is, taking a shared library name that's already in
>>>use is frankly rather rude.  Picking a different SONAME version to start
>>>with clearly isn't sufficient, as we now see.
>>
>>I regret any inconvenience our libgssapi library has caused.  We used
>>the obvious name and had no malicious intent.
>>
>>I will rename our library to libgssglue which will require a change in
>>librpcsecgss and will require nfs-utils to be reconfigured and
>>recompiled (no source changes required).  I will put out new versions
>>on Tuesday.
>
>I'll package libgssglue and change nfs-utils to depend on libgssglue.

Please remove libgssglue from testing.

I have filed #446077 to remove it from unstable.

>>K.C.
>>_______________________________________________
>>NFSv4 mailing list
>>NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
>>http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:51:13PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>>So in summary, what is the verdict?
>>
>>I am inclined to add a non-versioned conflicts for now, as I suspect
>>it might be a while before this can be solved in a better way.
>>
>>Also: No, I don't want to maintain a patch in Heimdal that renames the
>>library.
>>
>>If upstream could be convinced to rename the library that would be OK
>>though.
>
>Upstream decided to rename the UMich libgssapi library.
>
>>-- 
>>Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
>-- 
>http://v7w.com/anibal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: