Re: rhythmbox needs a binNMU

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rhythmbox needs a binNMU
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:52:12 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071001085212.GJ25833@dario.dodds.net>
Mail-followup-to: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20070929110638.GA11398@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <20070929110638.GA11398@xanadu.blop.info>

On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:06:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> rhythmbox needs a binNMU to be built against libtotem-plparser7:

> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   rhythmbox: Depends: libtotem-plparser1 (>= 2.17.5) but it is not
>   installable
> E: Broken packages

Scheduled (with others).

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: getaddrinfo: DNS round robin vs RFC3484 s6 rule 9, for etch
Next by Date: Re: libfwbuilder needs a binNMU
Previous by thread: Re: getaddrinfo: DNS round robin vs RFC3484 s6 rule 9, for etch
Next by thread: Re: libfwbuilder needs a binNMU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread