(Ccing -release@ as I'm not sure of what to do here) On 26/09/07 at 12:53 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Lucas, > thanks again for this service! > * DDPOMail robot <lucas-ddpomail@debian.org> [2007-09-26 09:35]: > > The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) > > you maintain in Debian: > > > > === libacpi: > > = This package has not been in testing for 79 days. > > = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > to testing for 79 days. > > See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libacpi> > > I wonder about this one, not build on arm and hppa. What is > the problem with them? Hi Nico, The package is not supposed to build on arm and hppa (since it's using Architecture: i386 ia64 amd64), but some parts of the infrastructure think it should be built there (dak? britney?). Release team, what's the correct way to deal with that? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature