Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613
- To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>, 428582@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, 428582-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:37:59 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070911053759.GA10798@glandium.org>
- Mail-followup-to: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>, 428582@bugs.debian.org, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>, 428582-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070911033331.GA24380@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
- References: <18032.15252.500061.515361@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20070705185553.GA32193@glandium.org> <20070705190615.GB18755@dario.dodds.net> <20070705192717.GA24487@networkno.de> <[🔎] 20070911033331.GA24380@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +0000, brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> wrote:
> [CC'd to debian-mips.]
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > > > miss another backport from the trunk.
> > >
> > > > Did someone check already ?
> > >
> > > Probably not; this discussion doesn't seem to be cc:ed to debian-mips?
> >
> > Plain upstream gcc head appears to work, gcc-snapshot fails to build
> > with ICE. I hope to have time for it mid of next week.
>
> Is there any news on this? gcc-snapshot is fixed (it built on mips),
> and gcc-4.2 is the default compiler (although it still has problems:
> #441633).
>
> Could someone check and see if xulrunner now builds with gcc-4.2 or
> gcc-snapshot and report back?
FWIW, iceape failed to build with gcc-4.2 with the same exact error that
xulrunner had, so xulrunner is likely to fail too. Note that as is,
xulrunner can't build with gcc-4.2 due to other visibility problems.
Mike
Reply to: