On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:08:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >Why does librpm4 have shlibs that require rebuilds of reverse dependencies >when there is no change in the library sonames? Hello Steve, Joey Hess put the following comments in debian/rules long time ago when he was the rpm maintainer. # Remember to update after upstream releases. The whole soname is # in the library names, so this mess is called for. dh_makeshlibs -V"librpm4 (>= 4.0.4), librpm4 (<< 4.0.5)" >(... and why is the package in unstable numbered with a Debian revision of >-0?) Why is that a problem? Best Regards, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature