Re: gfortran transition release goal proposal
Greetings, and thanks! OK this is ready for upload.
Do you or any others know of a resolution of
src/drotmg.f:101.15:
GO TO IGO,(120,150,180,210)
1
Warning: Obsolete: Assigned GOTO statement at (1)
src/drotmg.f:107.72:
ASSIGN 120 TO IGO
1
Take care,
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> writes:
> Camm,
>
> your email is bounding for me!
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:14:46PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Sure. I suppose we still have testsuite failures in
> > blas/lapack/atlas, yes? I'll try to take a look. Is refblas3 as good
> > a place to start as any?
>
> you need to you -ffloat-store gfortran option. see man gcc-4.2 for
> exoplanation. With attached patch, I got refblas3 testsuite succeed
> on i386 and it was told to me that it also works for amd64.
>
> --
> "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
>
> diff -urN refblas3-1.2/debian/control patch/refblas3-1.2.gft/debian/control
> --- refblas3-1.2/debian/control 2007-06-25 19:17:45.000000000 +0300
> +++ patch/refblas3-1.2.gft/debian/control 2007-06-19 18:27:49.000000000 +0300
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
> Standards-Version: 3.6.1
> -Build-Depends: g77, debhelper ( >= 4 ), tetex-extra
> +Build-Depends: gfortran-4.2, debhelper ( >= 4 ), tetex-extra
> Section: libs
>
> Package: refblas3
> diff -urN refblas3-1.2/debian/rules patch/refblas3-1.2.gft/debian/rules
> --- refblas3-1.2/debian/rules 2007-06-25 19:17:45.000000000 +0300
> +++ patch/refblas3-1.2.gft/debian/rules 2007-06-25 17:36:31.000000000 +0300
> @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
> # handled now in debian/compat
> #export DH_COMPAT=2
>
> -F77:=g77
> +F77:=gfortran-4.2
> GCC:=gcc
> -F77FLAGS:= -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ff90
> +F77FLAGS:= -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffloat-store
> #F77FLAGS:= -pipe -g -ff90
>
> ifeq ($(ARCH),alpha)
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Reply to: