Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?

To: "Joey Schulze" <joey@infodrom.org>
Cc: "Seth Lang" <sethlang@yahoo.com>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
From: erlv <erlv5241@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:11:23 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 2f7426020704100311p4189ff0ch9249666ae54b3e1e@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070410100314.GT28276@finlandia.home.infodrom.org>
References: <[🔎] 646152.60662.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20070410100314.GT28276@finlandia.home.infodrom.org>

no one is perfect .
: )

2007/4/10, Joey Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>:

Seth Lang wrote:
> Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?

Out of curiosity, which bugs in etch are so critical that you cannot
work with etch and that they would warrant another delay?

Regards,

Joey

--
Linux - the choice of a GNU generation.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

--
你好，这是来自erlv的邮件
祝你一切顺利，天天开心，一生平安
: )

Reply to:

References:
- Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
  - From: Seth Lang <sethlang@yahoo.com>
- Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
  - From: Joey Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Next by Date: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Previous by thread: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Next by thread: Re: Why was etch released as stable if it still has bugs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread