On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:42:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > On the other hand, the toolchain is frozen for quite some time and > > identical both in testing and unstable, and blender_2.42a-6 which is > > identical code-wise to -5etch1 has built on all archs, including mips > > and sparc, without any problems. > > Please refresh my memory, is there some reason we don't want to accept -6 > from unstable into etch? <http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/03/msg00677.html> lists your reasons. So far I assumed they still apply. In the light of the recent issues, would you prefer a -7 upload reverting everything from -6 except for the one-liner to fix CVE-2007-1253 (thus being identical to -5etch1)? Cheers, Flo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature