[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: could wwwoffle be included in etch?



Paul Slootman wrote:
> wwwoffle was removed from testing on 5th December due to a supposed
> critical bug, which I and the upstream maintainer have discussed with
> the reporter and we don't consider it a critical bug, considering that
> the user had made a configuration change to invoke the behaviour he
> complained about.
> 
> However, the current version does have a couple of RC bugs fixed as
> compared to the sarge version, and quite a number of improved / new
> debconf translations. (I uploaded a new version today with a policy
> violation fixed and another additional updated translation.)
> Not including wwwoffle in etch would result in the current users of
> wwwoffle having a version with known, fixed bugs.
> 
> I know it's a bit late in the day for this, but Frank Küster
> <frank@kuesterei.ch> had asked for its inclusion 29th December in his
> message <86tzzfhtrg.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>, and I had assumed that
> had succeeded (silly, I know...).

Sorry, at this stage of the release preparations we don't consider adding any
packages anymore.

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: