Re: Is this serious for etch? [abi@grinser.de: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]
Hi again.
Sorry for bothering you. I did not read the last part of the bug report
where it told me that it was marked as etch-ignore.
Ignore the last mail (and then this one as well).
Regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:23:34PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just got this bugreport and I agree that it is a problem.
>
> However I want your opinion whether this is serious or not. Especially
> as it is a bit tricky to get ntop into etch, because of the libgd2 dependency
> problem while building for some arches.
>
> Regards,
>
> // Ola
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Ablassmeier <abi@grinser.de> -----
>
> Envelope-to: ola@opalsys.net
> Delivery-date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:34:18 +0200
> Subject: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
> Reply-To: Michael Ablassmeier <abi@grinser.de>,
> 417013-maintonly@bugs.debian.org
> Resent-From: Michael Ablassmeier <abi@grinser.de>
> Resent-To: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
> Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:33:19 +0000
> Resent-Message-ID: <handler.417013.M.117541617018561@bugs.debian.org>
> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 417013
> X-Debian-PR-Package: ntop
> X-Debian-PR-Keywords: etch-ignore
> X-Debian-PR-Source: ntop
> From: Michael Ablassmeier <abi@grinser.de>
> To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on rietz.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
> RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <debbugs@bugs.debian.org>
> Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:33:23 +0000
> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
> X-Spamcheck-provider: Checked for spam by opalsys.net, postmaster@opalsys.net
>
> Package: ntop
> Version: 3:3.2-10
> Severity: serious
> Tags: etch-ignore
> Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
>
> hi,
>
> while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
> because of debconf beeing unavailable during postrm:
>
> Purging configuration files for ntop ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/ntop.postrm: line 6: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory
> dpkg: error processing ntop (--purge):
> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> ntop
>
> the full log can be found here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~abi/piuparts/ntop
>
> please be sure to use a conditional call to debconf and its commands (this is
> just an example):
>
> --
> if [ -f /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ]; then
> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> fi
>
> db_get ||:
> --
>
> Please also note: Bugs filed on Packages failing in postrm because of debconf
> beeing unavailable are not considered RC for etch, so are tagged etch-ignore.
>
> bye,
> - michael
>
>
>
> bye,
> - michael
>
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --
> --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
> / opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
> | ola@opalsys.net 654 65 KARLSTAD |
> | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> | http://opalsys.net/ UIN/icq: 4912500 |
> \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| ola@opalsys.net 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://opalsys.net/ UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: