On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:35:20AM +0000, Stephen Gran wrote: > I may be missing something, but why does it need to be moved? It starts > in rcS as well as rc2, so this should only ever be an issue in the rare > cases when you have to switch to runlevel 1 and back, right? This seems > like a rare enough occurence I'm not sure it's worth worrying about too > much, but I may be missing something here. Hi Stephen, the present situation has portmap at 18 and autofs and nis at 19; this is a problem even at normal bootup. Nis moving to 18 would improve things, but not fix them wholly for systems which switch to single-user and back - and that's where we are, discussing whether portmap may move its multiuser runlevel script to 17 so that nis could follow to 18. Regards, Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature