Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs
- To: anibal@debian.org, hesso@pool.math.tu-berlin.de, debian-release@lists.debian.org, 400952@bugs.debian.org, 341140@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pe?a <jfs@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:05:54 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070124200540.GA15231@sirena.org.uk>
- Mail-followup-to: anibal@debian.org, hesso@pool.math.tu-berlin.de, debian-release@lists.debian.org, 400952@bugs.debian.org, 341140@bugs.debian.org, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pe?a <jfs@debian.org>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs
> script to be something between 19nis and 20apache?
It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle
it looks like the best option.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: