Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

[Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>]

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:28:46PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
> >block 341140 by 400952
> >thankyou
> >
> >Hi Anibal and Javier,
> >
> >I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue
> >settled before Etch is released... what consequences do you fear
> >could arise from moving the script?
> 
> That's something we don't know.

So, that's something we don't want to do, certainly not at this stage of
the release cycle.

> >The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs to manually
> >shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common
> >setup... Moving autofs to start later (i.e. at 20) is probably
> >unwise (as explained earlier), although this seems to be what most
> >users currently do as a workaround.
> >
> >Maybe we should talk with the release team to get this in?
> 
> If the release team approves that change we'll change portmap to
> start at S17 as already suggested by Javier, see #400952 [0].

What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs
script to be something between 19nis and 20apache?

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D