Re: Bug#404733: Mozilla-based and related packages status
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:06:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The codebase is the same as the one for iceape and icedove currently in
> > unstable... the only difference is the way it is linked altogether in a
> > single big dynamic library instead of a single big binary program.
>
> Yeah, I've done some test builds now of xulrunner on my alpha, and this
> isn't a regression in xulrunner; it's either a regression in the toolchain,
> or a change in some underlying lib that trips the already known bug in
> binutils on alpha causing link times to scale poorly with the number of
> symbols.
... what uploads might have caused this regression?
>
> So the only fix needed here is to raise the timeouts on the buildd for
> iceweasel, iceape, icedove, and xulrunner to an obscene number.
Sorry for my ignorance, but would this timeout-fix mean that builds
for alpha will take ages in future (e.g. when building security
uploads)?
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal
asac@debian.org | `. `' Operating System
http://www.asoftsite.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: