Re: why is alpha a release candidate?

[amacater@galactic.demon.co.uk (Andrew M.A. Cater)]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:38:05PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> > So the release criteria require buildd redundancy.  And yet, half the
> > release candidate archs still don't have it.  It gets marked in yellow
> > on http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html.
> 
> The release critera also require a developer-available machine. This is
> not the case for the alpha architecture.
> 
Somebody ping on Paul Cupis: I gave him two dual Alpha 833 rack mount 
servers for use. It's quite possible he's not using one.

Andy

> -- 
>   .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
>  : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
>  `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
>    `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>