Hello, aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153. Now, is it worth trying to push for -4 in etch? the only package build-depending on iasl is qemu which already includes workarounds so maybe -4 can wait (and never appear as there's a new upstream release available). Thoughts? -- mattia :wq!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature