Re: BIND 8 deprecation for the release notes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/07 13:24, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:30:39PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>>> Sure, but python2.5 is not really usable: almost all the python modules a=
>>> re
>>>> compiled only for python2.4. For postgresql you are right and I'm wrong,
>>>> but I suppose that there are other examples in the archive where the only=
>>> a
>>>> major release is released.
>>>> =20
>>>> Anyway, my question still applies. :)
>>>> =20
>>> That got me wondering and it appears that Etch will ship with Apache
>>> 1.3.34? Why? It is considered a legacy release by ASF? Is the Debian
>>> security team really willing to support it for another 2-3 years?
> If you have a large webserver farm / custom modules for Apache / your
> third party application has hooks into Apache 1.3, you may still want
> it. Apache 2 will be what many will install: it may be useful to retain
> the choice.
>
>> The same goes for bind8, only that I didn't receive a
>> sustantial reply at all...
>
> Again: if your infrastructure / expertise is in BIND 8 and you can't
> afford to move? For some small group of users that may be reason enough.
Would popcon statistics be (imperfect but) useful in this situation?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFpp05S9HxQb37XmcRAqaGAJ9/8eumYwDJdi4xqJ1Z4qC5zxaWswCeM7ZN
qpue8jMyA+hUnLxrjMTFaQQ=
=NqW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: