Le Monday 31 December 2007 14:48:22 Rainer Dorsch, vous avez écrit : > Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 schrieb Bart Martens: > > I'm not convinced that the typical updates of flashplugin-nonfree should > > go via volatile. Updating flashplugin-nonfree from 9.0.48.0.* to > > 9.0.115.0.* involves a new release of closed source software, so it can > > include surprises that are very not welcome in Debian stable. Volatile > > is meant for fast/frequent/safe updates, for example for updating data > > for spam filters or virus scanners. Anything in volatile should be > > (almost?) as safe as stable. > > http://www.debian.org/volatile/ > > As you would have forseen this: 9.0.115.0.* breaks konqueror support both > in stable and testing: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455689 > > Rainer Should this can help resolve this issue ? http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=171 -- Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? Juvenal - Satire VI Landry MINOZA landry.minoza@free.fr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.