On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:50 +0100, Ina Zobel wrote: > If you disagree with one bit or another, please reply to this mail and > explain why these things should be handled differently. > flashplugin-nonfree stable 9.0.31.0.1 i386 source > flashplugin-nonfree updates 9.0.48.0.1etch1 i386 source > > flashplugin-nonfree - New upstream release fixes security problems This should be version 9.0.115.0.1~etch1. Regards, Bart Martens
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part