On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 01:44:05PM +0000, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:55:29PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > Hi, > > > > rebuilding Boost as-is would require a new Boost transition. Could > > we continue to build it with gcc 4.1? At least until 1.35.0 is out, > > that could be a few months away. > > On the other hand, gcc default is version 4.2 since September 1. It > would be nice to have boost built with the default gcc. > > Couldn't we do the transition now? I'm sure the RMs are thrilled to go for a new 2 to 3 months long migration. Couldn't boost be less insane and stop bumping sonames for no good reasons instead ? I mean what's the point of depending on the gcc or glibc version, whereas Debian already tracks that down for them. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgp1_zCYCd2TZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature