Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

[Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +0000, brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> wrote:
> > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > > > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > > > > miss another backport from the trunk.
> > > > 
> > > > > Did someone check already ?
> > > > 
> > > > Probably not; this discussion doesn't seem to be cc:ed to debian-mips?
> > > 
> > > Plain upstream gcc head appears to work, gcc-snapshot fails to build
> > > with ICE. I hope to have time for it mid of next week.
> > 
> > Is there any news on this?  gcc-snapshot is fixed (it built on mips),
> > and gcc-4.2 is the default compiler (although it still has problems:
> > #441633).
> > 
> > Could someone check and see if xulrunner now builds with gcc-4.2 or
> > gcc-snapshot and report back?
> 
> FWIW, iceape failed to build with gcc-4.2 with the same exact error that
> xulrunner had, so xulrunner is likely to fail too. Note that as is,
> xulrunner can't build with gcc-4.2 due to other visibility problems.

It seems iceape and iceweasel finally built on mips. I'll give a shot
with xulrunner.

Mike