Re: fftw3 3.1.2-3 accepted in unstable long ago, but not entered yet
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:52:47AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2007-10-27 Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 09:25:19PM +0100, David wrote:
> >> A point makes me think that something is wrong: my "local or obsolete"
> >> version is 3.1.2-2. On the developer's web
> >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fftw3.html it reads that the new version
> >> 3.1.2-3 was accepted on 3 October. Is there any error, that it is taking so
> >> long?
> > There is no binary package named fftw3 in unstable. The new binary package
> > name is libfftw3-3.
> >> I think that 3.1.2-3 should enter sid ASAP, or otherwise a binNMU should be
> >> provided.
> > BinNMUs are needed for the *reverse depends* of fftw3, not of fftw3 itself.
> Hello,
> I do not get it:
> (SID)ametzler@argenau:~$ apt-cache show libfftw3-3 | \
> grep -E '^Pa|Pro|Dep|Re|Ve'
> Package: libfftw3-3
> Version: 3.1.2-3
> Replaces: fftw3
> Provides: fftw3
> libfftw3-3 provides fftw3 and all dependencies on fftw3 are
> unversioned (I only checked sid, not lenny). So 3.1.2-3 should really
> simply be able to propagate to testing without any binNMUs..
Ah - the only remaining issue seems to be that the newest fftw3 isn't
built/uploaded yet on sparc, so upgrading fftw3 in testing drops the
previous fftw3 binary package and leaves all reverse-deps uninstallable on
sparc only.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: